In case you haven’t heard, the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) is considering revoking its current national policy on homosexuality — a policy which prohibits open homosexuals from joining as Scout youth, leaders, and volunteers.
On the BSA website under the section “Overview of Boy Scouts of America”, their stated purpose is “to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Scout Law.”
The values of the Scout Oath and Scout Law include being morally straight and clean. In keeping with these values, the BSA established a nationwide policy on homosexuality which prohibits open homosexuals from becoming members.
“We believe that homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the requirement in the Scout Oath that a Scout be morally straight and in the Scout Law that a Scout be clean in word and deed, and that homosexuals do not provide a desirable role model for Scouts.” (1991 BSA position statement)
The BSA rightly stated that homosexuality is inconsistent with being morally upright and clean. If open homosexuals were welcomed into leadership roles, the organization would be teaching youth members that homosexuality is an acceptable form of sexuality.
Back in 2000, James Dale, a former assistant Scoutmaster, was expelled from the BSA after they learned that he was an open homosexual and a pro-homosexual activist.
In response to the BSA revoking his membership, Dale filed a lawsuit in the New Jersey Superior Court, alleging that the BSA violated a state statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in places of public accommodation.
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled against the BSA, stating that they violated the State’s public accommodations law by revoking Dale’s membership based on his homosexuality.
In April of 2000, the BSA appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court [SCOTUS] to defend their policy on homosexuality and fight for their right to establish their own standards for membership and leadership.
The BSA won the court case, and the SCOTUS agreed that since Dale was a pro-homosexual activist and the co-president of a homosexual organization at college, his presence in the BSA would force them to send a message contrary to and inconsistent with their stated values. Some people suspect that a part of Dale’s pro-homosexual activism was to send such a message through his presence as a Scoutmaster.
BSA Compromise & Back-pedaling?
So, here we are in 2013, and the BSA is considering revoking its national policy on homosexuality and letting local BSA councils set their own individual policies on homosexuality.
This is an ungodly compromise. Yet it is not compromising enough for pro-homosexual activists like James Dale.
As many of us know, the pro-homosexual activist movement will not accept compromise. They demand nothing less than total endorsement, celebration, and normalization of homosexuality at every level of society.
“You can’t have children in one troop thinking that discrimination is acceptable and scouts in a neighboring troop to think that discrimination is unacceptable,” “The anti-gay policy was top-down. I think that nondiscrimination needs to be top-down as well.” (James Dale)
As implied by Dale’s statement above, the pro-homosexual crusade against the BSA will not end until they have fully overturned the BSA’s national policy on homosexuality and forced every local BSA council to welcome open homosexuals into its membership. Not one local council can be left unhomosexualized. They must all cower down before the idol of same-sex lust and acquiesce to a radical destructive sexual agenda.
A History of Compromise
This is not the first time that the BSA has potentially compromised to appease pro-homosexual activists.
In 2010, the BSA formed an 11-member committee to conduct a confidential two-year review to determine whether they should uphold their long-standing policy on homosexuality.
After two years of deliberation, the special committee “came to the conclusion that this policy is absolutely the best policy for the Boy Scouts.” (Deron Smith, BSA national spokesman)
Perhaps you’re wondering why I call this a compromise since the BSA decided to preserve their policy on homosexuality.
Well, considering that the BSA Scout Oath and Scout Law says to do their duty unto God, be obedient and reverent — why on earth would they even entertain the possibility of revoking a common sense policy on homosexuals? Where was their duty unto God, their obedience and reverence for Him?
Where was the urgency? Why did it take them TWO YEARS to review the matter and decide not to concede to the preposterous and dangerous demands of the pro-homosexual mafia? Is this foot-dragging behavior the type of character that Boy Scout youth should emulate?
When it comes to protecting children from sexual perversion, adults should automatically and firmly respond with a resounding “No!” It doesn’t take two years, two months, two weeks, two days, or even two hours to decide whether sexual deviants should or should not have access to children.
The fact that the BSA took two years to deliberate on a request which should have been rejected immediately indicates a deeper problem within the higher ranks of this organization.
Behind the “morally straight” and “clean” rhetoric of the BSA lies the dark history of a century-long cover-up of sexual abuse by Scout leaders.
This dark history is documented in over 14, 000 pages known as the “perversion files” which detail over twenty-thousand allegations of child sexual abuse by Scoutmasters and adult volunteers.
The BSA claims that these files were kept to track sex offenders and protect children, but past cases show that many of these accusations were never reported to the police. Instead, the accused pedophiles were quietly dismissed, shuffled to a different local troop, or re-admitted to the BSA at a later date.
In a 2010 Portland Oregon lawsuit, a jury ruled that the BSA failed to protect a former boy scout from a pedophile assistant Scoutmaster in the 1980′s, even though the abuser had previously admitted molesting other boy scouts. The jury awarded $20 million to the plaintiff.
The BSA destroyed thousands of its “ineligible volunteer” perversion files, but still has around 6, 000 files in its possession and fights against disclosing this information to the courts. This demonstrates a lack of transparency within the highest ranks of the BSA. Click here http://www.kosnoff.com/pdfs/1.pdf
To add to the much-warranted suspicion of BSA damage control, concealment, and cover-ups — the BSA excluded the public and the press from a November 1, 2012 closed-door ‘safety’ conference about child sex-abuse prevention. Why all the secrecy? What were they trying to hide from the public? Click here BSA damage control
BSA leadership reassures the public that child sexual abuse by accused pedophile leaders and adult volunteers is a thing of the past, and that they have since implemented prevention and awareness programs. However, the law firm Kosnoff Fasy claims that analysis of BSA internal files shows that a molesting scout leader is placed in the BSA “ineligible volunteer” files at a rate of one every three days for the past 50 years.
Kosnoff Fasy also claims that “For 80 years, the BSA has been aware that its organization attracts many pedophiles wanting to be scoutmasters. . . Because there is a higher risk that a boy will suffer sexual abuse if he joins the Boy Scouts, it is time that the BSA told the truth to parents and scouts about the size of the problem and the unique characteristics of scouting that make it particularly vulnerable to infiltration by pedophiles. . . The BSA has got to stop covering up these problems.”
None of this information was shared to take away from the honorable deeds and wholesome activities of the BSA. Nor is it intended to malign the character of BSA scout leaders and adult volunteers. Indeed, there are many sincere and dedicated individuals within the BSA organization.
However, we should not let the good things about the BSA blind us from being objective and taking immediate action to address their institutional concealment of child sexual abuse. The BSA is not exempt from accountability and public scrutiny by virtue of its honorable deeds, wholesome activities, and dedicated members.
It is shameful and despicable that some adults are trying to negate and minimize the reality of child sexual abuse within the BSA. We are not talking about one pedophile, as seen in the Sandusky scandal at Penn State. We are talking about the concealment of mountains of potential pedophiles and thousands of victims. This indicates a systemic crisis and a national cover-up from the highest ranks of BSA leadership down to the local level.
It is the duty of adults to protect children, not protect the public image of organizations and community leaders. Anyone who denies this or callously shrugs their shoulders at this horrific tragedy all for the sake of protecting the reputation and brand of the BSA, is negligent and enabling child sacrifice.
Considering the BSA’s cover-up of the perversion files, it is not surprising to see them once again dragging their feet and compromising on another sexual issue.
If they will cover up pedophilia, then it is nothing for them to eventually allow open homosexuals into their organization.
Secular humanists would object that allowing open homosexuals into the BSA is not the same as allowing pedophiles into leadership roles where they can sexually abuse boy scouts. This objection stems from a false distinction between homosexuality and pedophilia — that homosexuality is perfectly fine and on par with heterosexuality, but that pedophilia is immoral and criminal.
Those of us who are spiritually-minded know that in the eyes of God, both homosexuality and pedophilia are sinful, unnatural, abominable, and Satanic. The Lord makes no moral or spiritual distinction between homosexuality and pedophilia. A homosexual does not hold any “moral high ground” over a pedophile. Both are immoral, perverse, destructive, and demonic.
It is based upon this understanding that I said if the BSA will quietly dismiss accused pedophiles and even re-admit them to leadership roles, then it is nothing for them to eventually allow open homosexuals into their organization. There is no moral or spiritual distinction between the two.
No organization — be it the Roman Catholic church or the BSA — can allow one type of sexual deviancy (by covering it up) and disallow another type of sexual deviancy. Once an organization allows a spirit of sexual perversion to enter in and operate, it cannot close the door once the tsunami of sexual anarchy floods in.
The BSA & Interfaith Unity
Another reason why the BSA is compromising, is because it is built upon the slipping sands of interfaith unity.
Interfaith unity is based upon a few main false teachings: 1) There are many ways to God. 2) There is no absolute objective truth, there are “many different truths” for different people. Everyone has “their own truth.” 3) All religions actually worship the same God (the God of the Bible), they just call Him by different names. 4) Everyone should unite on common ground to “dialogue,” worship together, pray together, and work together to make the world a better place. 5) Interfaith unity can bring world peace.
What’s wrong with interfaith unity?
The belief that there are many ways to God is a lie. Jesus is the one-and-only exclusive way to the Father: “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.“
If someone seeks to know God, worship Him, and be saved — they must come to the Father through Jesus Christ. “There is salvation in no one else! God has given no other name under heaven by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12) “Truly, truly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. . . if anyone enters through Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture.” (John 10:7, 9)
Any religion which presents itself as “another way to God” or “an alternative path to salvation, enlightenment, or spirituality” is false, a Satanic deception, and antichrist (i.e., inserting itself in the place of Jesus).
The religions of the world are not equally valid nor spiritually-equivalent to Jesus Christ. It is blasphemy to demote Jesus to the same level as Islam, Buddhism, Mormonism, the Watchtower (the “Jehovah’s Witnesses”), Scientology, Roman Catholicism, the Baha’i religion, Hinduism, Judaism, Taoism, New Age spirituality, Wicca, the Nation of Islam, etc. All of these religions are a way which seem right to man, but they end in death.
The belief that “there is no absolute objective truth, everyone has their own truth” is a lie. Jesus not only said that He is the only way to the Father, but He also said that He is THE Truth. The notion that there are many different (contradictory) truths for each person is pure poppy cot. There is only one truth and His name is Jesus Christ. If something does not accord with Jesus and His teaching, then it is a LIE period — it is not “relative truth” for the person who believes it.
The nature of truth is based on the nature of Christ (because He is the truth), and Christ’s nature is unchanging/immutable and consistent (Malachi 3:6, Hebrews 13:8). He is not inconsistent nor schizophrenic — He does not reveal contradictory “truths” to different people. The Lord reveals one truth to all men, and that truth is Jesus Christ and man’s need to repent and believe in Him for salvation. If someone believes otherwise, it is not because “God revealed a different truth to them.” It is because they are a deceived idolater who exchanged the truth of God for a lie.
The belief that “all religions actually worship the same God (the God of the Bible), they just call Him by different names” is a lie.
Although there are some commonalities among the world religions, there are also many major fundamental differences between them. Hinduism teaches that there are many gods (polytheism). New Age spirituality teaches that “the universe is god and you are god.” Islam teaches that “Allah is the true god and Muhammad was his final prophet.” The God of Scripture teaches that Jesus is the only way to the Father and the only Savior sent to deliver mankind. With all of these fundamental differences, it is obvious that everyone is not worshiping the same God, especially not the God of the Bible.
The True and Living God only receives true worship (worship in Spirit and in Truth) offered up by born-again Believers through the mediation of Jesus Christ. Anything else offered up as “worship” is idolatry (the false worship of false gods), rebellion, witchcraft, paganism, strange fire, and sacrifices offered to demons (1 Corinthians 10:20-22).
One of the biggest deceptions today is the belief that interfaith unity can bring world peace, if only everyone “sets their differences aside” and unites on common ground to “dialogue,” worship together, pray together, and work together to make the world a better place.
For the born-again Believer, there is no “religious dialogue” with unbelievers unless we are sharing the Gospel with them, rebuking and refuting their errors, and proving from Scripture that Jesus is the Messiah. But if an unbeliever is not receptive of the Gospel, if they refuse to repent of their errors when rebuked and refuted, and if they reject that Jesus is the Messiah — there is no point in wasting time in “interfaith dialogue” with them.
Jesus said that if someone does not receive us (which would mean that they don’t receive Him), we are to brush the dust off of our feet, let our peace return to us, and move on — not “unite on common ground for dialogue and peace talks.”
Without reconciling to God through Jesus Christ, there is no peace. Jesus did not pray for world peace, nor did He come to bring peace to the world, but a sword of division. He divides the sheep (those who trust and follow Him) from the goats (those who reject Him and disobey Him). “My prayer is not for the world, but for those you have given me, because they belong to you.” (John 17:9) “Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household.” (Matthew 10:34-36)
Is it wrong for Believers to unite with unbelievers so that we can work together and make the world a better place? Yes it is. Jesus instructed BELIEVERS to work together in sharing the Gospel, clothing the naked, feeding the hungry, visiting the imprisoned, and taking care of the sick, widows, and orphans in their distress. We do not unite with enemies of God (unbelievers) to do the works of Jesus. That is disobedience, rebellion, and spiritual adultery which provokes God to jealousy: “You adulterers! Don’t you realize that friendship with the world makes you an enemy of God? I say it again: If you want to be a friend of the world, you make yourself an enemy of God.” (James 4:4)
Uniting with unbelievers to “make the world a better place” is an unequally-yoked endeavor. Nowhere in Scripture did Jesus, the apostles, or the prophets team up with unbelievers to do anything for God. How can 2 walk together except they be in agreement?
“Don’t team up with those who are unbelievers. How can righteousness be a partner with wickedness? How can light live with darkness? What harmony can there be between Christ and the devil? How can a believer be a partner with an unbeliever? And what union can there be between God’s temple and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God said: “I will live in them and walk among them. I will be their God, and they will be my people. Therefore, come out from among unbelievers, and separate yourselves from them, says the Lord. Touch not the unclean thing and I will welcome you. And I will be your Father, and you will be my sons and daughters, says the Lord Almighty.” (2 Corinthians 6:14-18)
Interfaith unity is a deception, designed to rally everyone around one global “new world order.” The “god” of this new world order is Satan himself. He is the “god” that the religions of the world are worshiping under different names — not the God of the Bible.
Born-again Christians have no business participating in interfaith unity. Revelations 17-18 says that one day, God is going to pour out His wrath upon this united effort of mankind. And God did not appoint us to suffer the judgment of His wrath, but to obtain salvation in Jesus Christ (1 Thessalonians 5:9). Because of His kindness, mercy, grace, and patience — He is giving people time to repent and calling Believers out of this new age tower of Babel: “Then I heard another voice calling from heaven, “Come out of her, my people. Do not take part in her sins, or you will be punished with her. For her sins are piled as high as heaven, and God remembers her evil deeds.” (Revelations 18:4-5)
For evidence that the Boy Scouts are in fact an interfaith religious organization, see their Manual for Chaplain Aides and Chaplains.
One section says “When present, members of the clergy or chaplain aide may be asked to lead the troop or other Scouting units in prayer. If the group consists of members with mixed beliefs, or if the beliefs of the group are unknown, then prayers should be of an interfaith content.“
The BSA website contains sample interfaith prayers and benedictions (the name of Jesus Christ is not mentioned anywhere). Christian parents, are you okay with your children being led in generic Satanic interfaith prayers? Are you okay with Scout leaders teaching your children to compromise their faith around unbelievers by refraining from using the name of Jesus?
On the BSA website under Conducting an Interfaith Service, it says “An interfaith service is a brief worship or meditation, specifically designed for Scouting events where there may be members of more than one faith group. The intention of an interfaith service (formerly known as a Scouts’ Own) is to provide a spiritual focus during a camping experience that does not reflect the views of a particular denomination or faith.”
That last statement is a lie. . . an interfaith service does reflect the views of a particular faith — the interfaith religion. Christian parents, are you okay with your children participating in religious services which reflect the views of the interfaith religion and contradict/oppose the Faith of Jesus Christ?
Under the same section it says “To help ensure that nothing in an interfaith service would offend any participant, invite representatives of all faith groups with members present to participate in developing the service. Care must be used so that one person’s religious traditions are not imposed to offend another person. For example, one should not direct all attendees to remove their hats before prayer, as those of Jewish and Muslim faiths pray with heads covered. A more acceptable call to prayer would be: “Let us each prepare to pray according to his or her tradition.” Similarly, stating, “This we ask in Jesus’ name,” while making the prayer personal to the person leading it, could be troubling to people of other religions.“
Reality is that many people find Jesus offensive and do not want to hear His name. But that does not mean we should compromise and deny Christ by refraining from using His name around unbelievers because they might get offended. Jesus said “Everyone who acknowledges me publicly here on earth, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. But everyone who denies me here on earth, I will also deny before my Father in heaven.” (Matthew 10:32-33)
To refrain from praying in the name of Jesus is to deny Him and be ashamed of Him before men. Such christless prayers do not reach the ears of God, but are idolatrous pagan sacrifices and vain empty powerless words. Believers should not be praying with unbelievers in the first place, because it violates the prohibition against being unequally-yoked. We should be praying with other Believers FOR unbelievers to repent and be saved.
More evidence that the BSA is an interfaith religious organization:
“From the very beginning, the Scouting movement has encouraged its members to be faithful in the practice of their religious beliefs. . . . The Cub Scout Promise, the Scout Oath, and the Explorer Code each call upon Scouts to pledge themselves to do their duty to God. At the same time, Scouting espouses no creed and favors no single faith over another faith. Rather, Scouting provides programs and ideals that complement the aims of all religions. . . . Scouting encourages a Scout to recognize an obligation or duty to God, but does not define what a belief in God is or define what constitutes a religious organization. As Scout leaders we must be careful not to favor one faith over another. In conducting Scouting activities, we must be sensitive to the need to encourage all Scouts to grow in their own religious beliefs and faiths. Remember that Scouts have a “Duty to God.” (The Official Boy Scout Handbook, 1990)
“The Boy Scouts of America has always been committed to the moral, ethical, and spiritual development of our youth. Scouting is not a religion, but duty to God is a basic tenet of the Scout Oath and Law. Scouting does not seek to impose its beliefs upon others who do not share them. Virtually every religion is represented in Scouting and the BSA does not define or interpret God. That is the role of the Scout’s family and religious advisers. Scouting respects those who do not share its beliefs and it would not ask others to alter their faith in any fashion in order to become Scouts. They too are free to follow their own beliefs.” (Reaffirmation of the Position of the Boy Scouts of America on Duty to God, October 7, 1998)
The last underlined statements above are a lie. Christians would have to alter their faith in order to observe the interfaith beliefs of the BSA and participate in their interfaith services. A Believer who joins the BSA is not free to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, because it is impossible to do so and at the same time follow the interfaith beliefs of the BSA. One cancels out the other. Jesus said that it is impossible to serve 2 masters at the same time (Matthew 6:24). Christians cannot serve Him and simultaneously serve the idol of interfaith unity.
Believers have a responsibility to raise our children in the discipline and instruction of the Lord (Ephesians 6:4). The interfaith beliefs of the BSA are most definitely not in agreement with the discipline and instruction of the Lord, but in fact, oppose the word of God.
Proverbs 22:6 says to direct our children onto the right path, and when they get older, they will not depart from it. Yet research shows that by the time children leave “Christian” households and go to college, they abandon what little Christian teaching they had, and become secular humanists (atheists, agnostics, and new agers). One of the reasons why Christian parents are losing the battle for their children’s soul, is because they immersed them in the influence of New Age spirituality.
Once again, I am not trying to take away from the honorable deeds and wholesome activities of the BSA. But all of the honorable and wholesome activities are not worth it if it means subjecting your child to the interfaith agenda.
Are you willing to sacrifice your child’s spiritual development just so they can go camping, sell cookies, and volunteer in the community? Can’t they do all of the latter WITHOUT joining an interfaith religious organization which will lead them to compromise their faith in Jesus Christ? Why don’t parents do these things with their sons independently? Or their local church? Have parents and the local church relegated their responsibility to raise God-fearing young men to an interfaith group like the BSA, which concealed pedophilia crimes for decades and is now deciding whether they will allow open homosexuals?
The BSA is not built on the rock solid foundation of Jesus Christ. It was built on the shaky foundation of interfaith unity. That is why it was so easily infiltrated by pedophiles, and that is why the BSA is possibly about to give way to the demands of the homosexual mafia.
An organization cannot be interfaith, inclusionist, and enable child sexual abuse — then turn around and try to lock out open homosexuals from its membership. An organization cannot build itself on demonic religious beliefs, empower devilish crimes, and then tell children of the devil that they are not allowed to join if they are open homosexuals or atheists.
If the BSA welcomes the membership of people who worship rocks, trees, the sun, the moon, animals, the universe, shiva, etc — then by what logic, basis, or authority can they exclude people who don’t believe in any god(s) at all and worship their own lusts?
If the BSA welcomes the membership of people who practice homosexual-affirming religions — then by what logic, basis, or authority can they exclude open homosexuals? Because homosexuality isn’t morally straight and clean? O-K. But interfaith unity isn’t morally straight and clean either. Nor is Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Scientology, Mormonism, or any other religion which denies the true Jesus Christ.
I am not saying that I agree with homosexual activists and atheists protesting the BSA, filing lawsuits, and trying to bully their way into the BSA. I think it is dangerous to allow open homosexuals into a youth organization, and I think it is absurd for an atheist (who detests religion) to join a religious organization. I’m simply pointing out the quagmire that inclusionist-interfaith groups get themselves into when they try to exclude certain groups. They have no true foundation or authority to stand on.
The Elephant In The Room
Some homosexual activists and their “progressive” sympathizers point out the hypocrisy of the BSA — enabling pedophile crimes for decades, yet disallowing open homosexuals as members.
But here is what I wonder. . . . why do homosexual activists who know about the pedophile problem in the BSA STILL WANT TO JOIN ANYWAY??
It’s as if homosexual activists are saying “Hey! The BSA allows pedophiles! We want to join too!” . . . .HUH!?? Why would homosexuals (who claim to be “morally straight” and “clean”) want to join an organization with a history of enabling and covering-up pedophile crimes? To me, their aggressive fight to join a youth group with a systemic crisis of child sexual abuse is a huge elephant in the room and very suspect.
If homosexuals were truly “morally straight” and “clean” they wouldn’t want to join an organization with a marred history of concealing pedophile crimes. The fact that they do, shows that something is seriously wrong with homosexuals activists, and that there is a segment of men in the homosexual activist movement who desire access to children. I cannot think of any other reason why grown homosexual men would viciously fight to join an organization with a systemic problem of child sexual abuse.
The Roman Catholic church also has a long history of systemic child sexual abuse and enabling pedophiles. Because of this, many people have rightly left the Roman Catholic church. They have stopped giving the RCC their money and ceased supporting the pope. To support the RCC is to support their damage control system which protects pedophiles and victimizes children. A rational, humane, caring person understands this. Only someone who is perverse and twisted will acknowledge the systemic crisis of child sexual abuse in the RCC, and still INSIST on joining anyway. Morally straight and clean people don’t want anything to do with the RCC. They don’t protest and fight to be altar boys or priests in the RCC. The same goes for the BSA.
Many people suspect that there are homosexual pedophiles within the homosexual activist movement, and that this segment is behind the fiery drive to change the BSA policy on homosexuality so that they can have access to children. Homosexual activists insist that this is not the case. However, they bring suspicion upon themselves by pointing out the pedophile problem in the BSA and then fighting for their right to join.
Christian parents, if you put your son(s) in the BSA, be aware of everything I have shared with you here. Your son’s Scoutmaster may or may not have been properly and thoroughly screened. Your son will be unequally-yoked with unbelievers and exposed to interfaith beliefs. And the BSA policy on homosexuality might be revoked very soon. The presence of open homosexuals in the Boy Scouts will radically change your son’s understanding of human sexuality, and that is precisely what homosexual activists want.
This controversy is not about an “oppressed minority group” seeking equality in the BSA so that they can go camping, sell cookies, and volunteer in the community. This is about an extremist fringe group seeking to re-define human sexuality so that they can absolve themselves of feeling any guilt or conviction of sin.
Homosexual activists do not care about Boy Scout youth. They are not doing this for the children. They are narcissistic, so they are doing this for themselves to gratify their own lusts. They view children as a pawn, and they want to exploit the Boy Scouts as a tool to advance their radical sexual agenda.
They know that they cannot change your mind, so they are circumventing your parental authority to gain access to impressionable children and re-program their minds. Please wake up and realize the severity of this spiritual war. I pray that you will do the right thing.